🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.